Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

You can use same lot selection to relieve the same lots across multiple accounting bases within an entity in order to keep lots in sync across bases.

Why Lot Structures Become Out of Sync

In Eagle Accounting, a position on one accounting basis works independently from the same position in a different basis. Differences in accounting standards for different accounting bases can result in differences in lot structure and position cost. Such differences can include wash sale loss deferrals, amortization, or the result of using different lot relief methods. 

A typical cause for these differences is wash sale processing, which is not a GAAP requirement. Wash sale guidelines allow the disallowance of losses from the disposition of securities for tax purposes. The disallowed loss amounts result in the adjustment of the cost basis of open lots that remain in a position after a close transaction is processed. There are scenarios that can also result in the fracturing of open lots if the close quantity is less than the open lot quantity of the lot that receives the disallowed loss. The fracture can result in multiple open lots in a USTAX basis with a total quantity that equates to the quantity of a single lot in a GAAP basis. Disallowed losses are not considered for GAAP accounting. Therefore book cost is not adjusted and fractures do not occur from wash sale processing.

Due to potential differences in lot cost and structure, lot selection logic that occurs during close processing can potentially result in the selection of different lots between bases than if the selection logic was applied to each basis independently.

When you use same lot selection, despite the difference in cost and lot structure, the system relieves the “same” lots across all bases on an entity. The ending result is that the remaining lots in each basis originate from the same lots even though the structure (due to wash sales) and cost may be different.

Content on this page:

How Same Lot Selection Affects Close Transaction Processing

When you use same lot selection, you identify an accounting basis within an entity as the controlling basis to use for lot selection. When the system executes a trade on both bases, it uses the lot selection results of the controlling basis to perform lot selection for the non-controlling basis. The Original Event ID (tag 457) acts as a common lot identifier on transactions and the common link across lots for multiple accounting bases. This identifier indicates that a lot in a position on one basis is the same lot on another basis. Due to fractured lots caused by wash sales, multiple lots on one basis can correspond to a single lot on another basis. This tag has the same value on the fractured lot and its sub-lots in the case of wash sales and should be true for converted lots across bases. 

Automated Processing


Manual Processing

Say you are processing a manual close for a transaction that uses the Identified Lot (IDLOT) lot selection method. When the system identifies the lot or lots to close, it can create a close that spans across open lots if multiple targets exist. This example applies to an IDLOT close transaction that must span across lots created as a result of wash sale processing. In the example of a wash sale, an open lot can be fractured. The fractured open lot and its sub-lots all share the same Original Event ID but have different Open Event IDs (tag 151).

When Eagle Accounting processes an IDLOT close transaction, the close attempts to find either a matching trade ticket number or open event ID for the close message’s target trade ticket number or target event ID. Once a match is made, the code discontinues the “search.” In the case of a fractured lot, you may want to target the fractured lot and its sub-lots with one close message. The IDLOT logic considers multiple matches based on original event ID as long as the open lot quantities can satisfy the close quantity. This course of action is more prevalent where the secondary or non-controlling basis has wash sales “enabled” where the primary or controlling basis did not.


WRITERS NOTE: this is iffy. not sure what is manual vs. automated behavior

About Pending Transactions and Same Lot Selection

When you use pending transactions and also use same lot selection, the system uses the controlling basis when you manually cancel a transaction. For entities marked as pending trade eligible (tag 3679 set to Y), the system insert a copy of the manually cancelled transaction to the Pending Trades table for the controlling basis. If there is no controlling basis, it stores a copy of the transaction for the primary basis.

About Reconciliation and Same Lot Selection

If you use same lot selection and use Eagle solutions for reconciliation, STAR to PACE Direct sends the Original Event ID to the Eagle data warehouse tables for use in reconciliation when comparing lots. You can set up the reconciliation process to identify expected accounting differences and to assign reason codes that inform you why lots are out of sync. For example, if you have known amortization methods differences between bases that would cause a break each day, you can set up rules to evaluate the difference to see if it met certain conditions. If conditions are met, the system can flag the amortization difference as an expected or known difference and assign it a specific reason codde. 



  • No labels