Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Reverted from v. 3

...

The grids in the following table are meant to provide an idea of the volume of data that can be produced.

Estimated Audit Records per Fund / Performance Frequency 

Time

Frequency

Records/Fund*

1

Day

2

1

Month

32

1

Quarter

91

1

Year

366

5

Year

1830

10

Year

3660



5981

  • Estimated



The number of records grow every time you run the process for a new effective date. For example, if you run the process described in the previous table for 10 days in a row, you have approximately 59,810 audit records per fund.

The following table shows an example field rule (not recommended).

Extreme Volume Case Example (Not a Recommended Workflow)

 

Records/Fund

Funds in Report

Audit Records per Report

1 Year No Load Pre Tax

366

200

73200

1 Year No Load Post Tax

366

200

73200

1 Year No Load Post Liq

366

200

73200

5 Year No Load Pre Tax

1830

200

366000

5 Year No Load Post Tax

1830

200

366000

5 Year No Load Post Liq

1830

200

366000

10 Year No Load Pre Tax

3660

200

732000

10 Year No Load Post Tax

3660

200

732000

10 Year No Load Post Liq

3660

200

732000

ITDYear No Load Pre Tax*

3660

200

732000

ITD Year No Load Post Tax*

3660

200

732000

ITD Year No Load Post Liq*

3660

200

732000





Sub total

28548

200

5,709,600

*Assume 10 years of history




The example in the previous table is an extreme case of what can happen if you attempt to log numerous fields for many funds. The fields are common for year end performance reporting but not necessarily for auditing. For example, there are three separate 1 year fields. Each would result in 366 audit records per fund, per effective date.

...